Age, Biography and Wiki
Raymond Gruender was born on 5 July, 1963 in St. Louis, Missouri, United States, is an American judge. Discover Raymond Gruender's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is He in this year and how He spends money? Also learn how He earned most of networth at the age of 60 years old?
| Popular As |
N/A |
| Occupation |
N/A |
| Age |
60 years old |
| Zodiac Sign |
Cancer |
| Born |
5 July, 1963 |
| Birthday |
5 July |
| Birthplace |
St. Louis, Missouri, U.S. |
| Nationality |
United States |
We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on 5 July.
He is a member of famous with the age 60 years old group.
Raymond Gruender Height, Weight & Measurements
At 60 years old, Raymond Gruender height not available right now. We will update Raymond Gruender's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.
| Physical Status |
| Height |
Not Available |
| Weight |
Not Available |
| Body Measurements |
Not Available |
| Eye Color |
Not Available |
| Hair Color |
Not Available |
Dating & Relationship status
He is currently single. He is not dating anyone. We don't have much information about He's past relationship and any previous engaged. According to our Database, He has no children.
| Family |
| Parents |
Not Available |
| Wife |
Not Available |
| Sibling |
Not Available |
| Children |
Not Available |
Raymond Gruender Net Worth
His net worth has been growing significantly in 2022-2023. So, how much is Raymond Gruender worth at the age of 60 years old? Raymond Gruender’s income source is mostly from being a successful . He is from United States. We have estimated
Raymond Gruender's net worth
, money, salary, income, and assets.
| Net Worth in 2023 |
$1 Million - $5 Million |
| Salary in 2023 |
Under Review |
| Net Worth in 2022 |
Pending |
| Salary in 2022 |
Under Review |
| House |
Not Available |
| Cars |
Not Available |
| Source of Income |
|
Raymond Gruender Social Network
Timeline
Gruender has been consistently mentioned as a possible nominee for the Supreme Court in a Republican administration. On May 18, 2016, then Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump announced that Gruender was on his list of potential Supreme Court nominees.
Gruender was nominated to the Eighth Circuit by President George W. Bush on September 29, 2003 to fill a seat vacated by Judge Pasco Bowman II. The United States Senate confirmed him almost eight months later on May 20, 2004 by a vote of 97–1, with the only vote against his confirmation coming from U.S. Senator Tom Harkin. Gruender received his commission on June 5, 2004.
Prior to joining the federal bench, Gruender worked as an attorney both in private practice and public service. After law school, he was in private practice at Lewis, Rice & Fingersh from 1987 to 1990, at which point he became an Assistant United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri. In 1994, he ran for election as St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney and lost to the incumbent. He then returned to private practice at Thompson Coburn. In 1996, he was the Missouri state campaign director for Bob Dole's president campaign. In 2000, he left Thompson Coburn to rejoin the United States Attorneys' Office, and in 2001 he became the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri, a position he remained in until his confirmation to the Eighth Circuit in 2004.
Gruender was born in St. Louis, Missouri. He graduated from the prestigious Jesuit, all-boy college preparatory school, St. Louis University High School, in 1981. He then attended Washington University in St. Louis and Washington University School of Law and earned three degrees: a Bachelor of Arts, a Juris Doctor, and a Master of Business Administration. In 2006, he received the Distinguished Young Alumni Award from the law school.
Raymond W. Gruender (born July 5, 1963) is a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Gruender authored the Eighth Circuit's opinion in In Re Union Pacific Railroad Employment Practices Litigation, No. 06-1706, which concluded that the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 did not give female employees the right to insurance coverage for contraceptives used solely to prevent pregnancy. This opinion has been cited in the context of the debate over the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act contraception mandate.
